Case Law Update: Florida Supreme Court Issues New AI Rules for Court Filings

Quick Answer

Florida Supreme Court implements statewide rules requiring attorneys to certify AI-generated citations amid growing concerns over fabricated case law.

Submit a Policy or Denial Letter for Review Free review by our property damage attorneys — response within 24 hours.Submit for Review →Ask A Lawyer Ask us anything about your claim — we're online now.Ask Us a Question →Pierre A. Louis, Esq.
Pierre A. Louis, Esq.Louis Law Group

6/2/2026 | 1 min read

Florida Supreme Court Addresses AI Hallucinations in Legal Practice

On June 2, 2026, the Florida Supreme Court issued groundbreaking new rules addressing a growing concern in legal practice: artificial intelligence "hallucinations" or fabricated case citations in court filings. These rules, effective June 15, 2026, establish statewide standards for attorneys using AI tools and create accountability measures for erroneous citations.

Background: The Growing Problem of AI-Generated Errors

Artificial intelligence tools have become increasingly popular in legal practice, particularly for legal research and brief writing. However, these tools can generate content that appears credible but contains fabricated case citations, legal reasoning, or court opinions that simply do not exist.

The problem has reached concerning proportions nationwide. Legal researcher Damien Charlotin's tracking algorithm has identified over 1,500 instances worldwide of courts calling out AI hallucinations in filings, with 54 documented cases in Florida courts alone.

Prior to this statewide rule, various Florida circuit courts had implemented their own disclosure and certification requirements, creating what the Supreme Court described as a "patchwork of differing disclosure and certification obligations."

Key Provisions of the New Rules

Certification Requirements

Under the new rules, attorneys must:

  • Certify that all case rulings and opinions cited in filings actually exist
  • Verify that citations are accurately referenced
  • Take responsibility for the accuracy of AI-generated content

Sanctions Authority

The rules authorize lower courts to impose sanctions on:

  • Attorneys who cite bogus cases or authorities
  • Self-represented litigants who submit fabricated citations
  • Any party who fails to meet the new certification standards

Notable Insurance Industry Case

The tracking data reveals that insurance litigation has not been immune to this problem. In Arch Insurance Co. vs. A3 Development (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, October 2025), attorneys for the development company cited two court rulings that did not exist.

The federal judge granted a motion to strike the company's pleading, noting that the attorneys took responsibility "for providing misinformation to the Court and for the firm's irresponsible use of artificial intelligence." While the judge appreciated the lawyers' candor and apologies, the case demonstrates the real consequences of AI errors in insurance litigation.

Impact on Public Adjusters and Claims Professionals

Enhanced Due Diligence Requirements

Public adjusters working with attorneys on complex property damage claims should expect:

  • More thorough vetting of legal research and citations
  • Potentially longer preparation times for legal filings
  • Increased scrutiny of AI-assisted legal work

Documentation Standards

The new rules emphasize the importance of accurate documentation and citation practices, principles that extend beyond legal filings to:

  • Claim documentation and evidence presentation
  • Expert reports and technical analyses
  • Communication with carriers and counsel

Practical Takeaways for Property Damage Claims

Working with Legal Counsel

When collaborating with attorneys on property damage disputes, public adjusters should:

  • Discuss the law firm's AI usage policies and verification procedures
  • Ensure all technical reports and expert opinions are properly documented
  • Maintain detailed records of all claim-related communications and decisions

Technology Integration

While AI tools can be valuable for claim analysis and documentation, the Florida Supreme Court's action highlights the need for:

  • Human oversight of all AI-generated content
  • Verification of factual claims and technical data
  • Clear disclosure when AI tools assist in claim preparation

Looking Forward: Industry Best Practices

The Florida Supreme Court's proactive approach suggests that other states may follow with similar rules. Insurance professionals should expect increased emphasis on:

  • Accuracy and verification in all professional work product
  • Transparent disclosure of technology assistance
  • Enhanced professional responsibility standards

These developments reinforce the fundamental principle that technology should enhance, not replace, professional judgment and due diligence in property damage claims.

How Louis Law Group Can Help

At Louis Law Group, we understand the evolving landscape of property damage law and the importance of accurate, reliable legal representation. Our team stays current with all rule changes and maintains strict standards for legal research and citation accuracy. Whether you're a public adjuster seeking legal support for a complex claim or a policyholder facing claim disputes, we combine cutting-edge legal research with thorough verification processes.

Contact Louis Law Group today at (833) 657-4812 to discuss how our experienced property damage attorneys can assist with your case while maintaining the highest standards of accuracy and professional responsibility.


Source: Insurance Journal - Florida Supreme Court Posts New Rule on AI Hallucinations in Court Filings

Submit a Policy or Denial Letter for Review

Our property damage attorneys will review your case and respond within 24 hours · Free · Confidential

Pierre A. Louis, Esq.

Pierre A. Louis, Esq.

Pierre A. Louis is an attorney and founder of Louis Law Group, specializing in property damage insurance claims and Social Security disability (SSDI/SSI). He has recovered over $200 million for clients against major insurance companies.

Have a policy or denial letter? Get a free attorney review — 24-hour response.Check Your Eligibility →Ask a Question (833) 657-4812

★★★★★ 4.7 · 67 Google Reviews

What Our Clients Say

Real reviews from real clients who fought their insurance companies — and won.

★★★★★

"Citizens denied our roof leak claim, but this firm fought for us and got money for our repairs. We even had funds left over after fixing the roof."

★★★★★

"Pierre and his team are amazing. They truly cater to their clients and help you get the most from your insurance company."

★★★★★

"When my insurance company denied my roof damage claim, Louis Law Group stepped in and fought for me. I'm extremely satisfied with the results they obtained."

★★★★★

"They accomplished exactly what they set out to do and helped me finally receive my insurance check."

★★★★★

"Louis Law Group handled our homeowners insurance dispute and got results much faster than we expected. Excellent service and great communication."

★★★★★

"Very professional attorneys with outstanding attention to detail. They will not stop fighting for their clients."

* Reviews from Google. Results may vary by case.

How it Works

No Win, No Fee

We like to simplify our intake process. From submitting your claim to finalizing your case, our streamlined approach ensures a hassle-free experience. Our legal team is dedicated to making this process as efficient and straightforward as possible.

You can expect transparent communication, prompt updates, and a commitment to achieving the best possible outcome for your case.

Free Case Evaluation

Let's get in touch

We like to simplify our intake process. From submitting your claim to finalizing your case, our streamlined approach ensures a hassle-free experience. Our legal team is dedicated to making this process as efficient and straightforward as possible.

12 S.E. 7th Street, Suite 805, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301